Immigrants from Thailand vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,500,144 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Thailand communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.551. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Thailand within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.072% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Thailand corresponds to a decrease of 71.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,337 compared to $128,140, a difference of 40.3%), per capita income ($42,289 compared to $56,709, a difference of 34.1%), and median household income ($83,327 compared to $111,519, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.0%), householder income over 65 years ($60,217 compared to $71,567, a difference of 18.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,645 compared to $62,083, a difference of 22.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 47.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 44.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 43.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.66%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 33.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.58%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 27.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.51%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 41.9%), births to unmarried women (32.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 39.0%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.26%), family households with children (28.2% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and family households (63.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 18.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 51.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 49.6%), and master's degree (14.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 44.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.010%), and 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Thailand and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 32.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.6%).