Seminole vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,555,696 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Seminole communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.823. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Seminole within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.251% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Seminole corresponds to an increase of 251.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($76,584 compared to $128,140, a difference of 67.3%), median household income ($69,420 compared to $111,519, a difference of 60.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($80,077 compared to $127,500, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.090%), householder income under 25 years ($45,649 compared to $62,083, a difference of 36.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,373 compared to $71,567, a difference of 36.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (22.8% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 83.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (18.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 76.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.77%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 27.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 35.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.5% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 60.8%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 52.9%), and divorced or separated (14.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.19%), average family size (3.24 compared to 3.26, a difference of 0.58%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 25.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.5%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 100.8%), and master's degree (11.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 85.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (93.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 9th grade (94.8% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and 11th grade (91.5% compared to 92.2%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Seminole and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (15.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 93.4%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 73.5%), and vision disability (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 69.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 10.7%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.3%).