Immigrants from Ireland vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,386,939 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Ireland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ireland within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.068% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ireland corresponds to a decrease of 68.1 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($57,075 compared to $62,083, a difference of 8.8%), median household income ($104,692 compared to $111,519, a difference of 6.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($120,333 compared to $128,140, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($56,584 compared to $56,709, a difference of 0.22%), median family income ($127,584 compared to $131,067, a difference of 2.7%), and median male earnings ($67,698 compared to $70,146, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (17.1% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.97%), female poverty (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and poverty (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 21.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 17.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.24%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 15.4%), divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 0.63%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.97%), and married-couple households (48.0% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 21.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 49.8%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and high school diploma (91.3% compared to 89.3%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (71.0% compared to 71.0%, a difference of 0.030%), master's degree (20.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.13%), and college, 1 year or more (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ireland and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 30.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.5%).