Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 199,056,353 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 1.7 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,017 compared to $56,709, a difference of 38.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,058 compared to $128,140, a difference of 34.8%), and median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $70,146, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 0.37%), householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $71,567, a difference of 0.77%), and householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $62,083, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 41.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 30.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.1% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 41.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 22.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 45.5%), single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.46%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 47.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 44.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 16.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 30.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 75.5%), no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 70.8%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.5% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.62%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.3%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 42.2%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 4.0%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 4.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.8%).