Cape Verdean vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 85,743,850 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Cape Verdean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.142. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cape Verdeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cape Verdeans corresponds to a decrease of 3.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,758 compared to $128,140, a difference of 49.4%), median household income ($75,848 compared to $111,519, a difference of 47.0%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,580 compared to $127,500, a difference of 45.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 8.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $62,083, a difference of 20.8%), and median female earnings ($38,614 compared to $49,818, a difference of 29.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (21.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 131.8%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.3% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 57.6%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 55.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 11.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 51.1%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 49.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.4% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 49.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.5% compared to 17.4%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (44.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 46.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.3% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 9.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 0.56%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 83.1%), births to unmarried women (41.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 75.3%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 2.2%), average family size (3.17 compared to 3.26, a difference of 2.9%), and family households (61.8% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 47.3%), no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 37.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.5% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (46.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.0% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 27.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 91.9%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 90.7%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cape Verdean and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 75.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 72.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (7.0% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 62.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.9%), hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.8%), and cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 20.0%).