Tlingit-Haida vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,502,298 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Tlingit-Haida communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.233. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tlingit-Haida within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tlingit-Haida corresponds to a decrease of 18.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,987 compared to $128,140, a difference of 37.8%), median male earnings ($52,409 compared to $70,146, a difference of 33.8%), and median household income ($83,968 compared to $111,519, a difference of 32.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,914 compared to $62,083, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,922 compared to $71,567, a difference of 13.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 33.0%), single female poverty (21.9% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 32.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.3% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 7.7%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 7.9%), and family poverty (8.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (20.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 171.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 53.6%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (8.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 32.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.9% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.3% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 0.34%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 46.0%), births to unmarried women (32.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 36.6%), and divorced or separated (13.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.16 compared to 3.26, a difference of 3.3%), currently married (46.7% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 12.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.8% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 6.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.9% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 86.2%), doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 62.9%), and professional degree (4.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (87.0% compared to 86.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tlingit-Haida and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 82.1%), disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 62.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.9%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and disability age over 75 (50.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 8.9%).