Barbadian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 107,243,046 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.203. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.031% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 31.2 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,565 compared to $128,140, a difference of 43.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $127,500, a difference of 41.2%), and median household income ($79,664 compared to $111,519, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $62,083, a difference of 18.9%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $49,818, a difference of 20.7%), and median earnings ($45,846 compared to $59,433, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 81.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 65.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 18.4%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 44.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and male unemployment (6.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.8% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 63.5%), births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 56.8%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 49.6%, a difference of 26.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.26, a difference of 1.0%), family households (62.5% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and family households with children (26.0% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 130.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 65.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 52.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 37.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 52.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 72.3%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.010%), 3rd grade (97.2% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and 2nd grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 37.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 3.4%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 9.5%).