Immigrants from Belize vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,759,967 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Immigrant from Belize communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.083. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Belize within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Belize corresponds to a decrease of 23.4 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($83,141 compared to $128,140, a difference of 54.1%), median family income ($89,197 compared to $131,067, a difference of 46.9%), and per capita income ($38,614 compared to $56,709, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.1%), householder income under 25 years ($51,223 compared to $62,083, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,665 compared to $71,567, a difference of 33.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 67.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 67.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 13.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 42.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.6% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.8% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 59.5%), births to unmarried women (37.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 58.3%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 0.65%), family households (64.9% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and average family size (3.39 compared to 3.26, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 35.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 4.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (49.9% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 108.9%), professional degree (3.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 85.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.42%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.42%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Belize and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 44.8%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.8% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 6.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.9%).