Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 245,440,524 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.419. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.6 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $56,709, a difference of 70.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($75,647 compared to $128,140, a difference of 69.4%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $111,519, a difference of 64.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.9%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $62,083, a difference of 30.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $71,567, a difference of 37.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 105.6%), family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 96.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (23.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 95.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 20.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 45.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 99.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 65.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 63.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 20.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 7.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 82.3%), single father households (3.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 75.0%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 65.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 0.32%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 26.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 18.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 1.2%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 116.8%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 109.6%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 105.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.24%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.2%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 105.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 86.7%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 64.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 13.2%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%).