Mexican American Indian vs Immigrants from Hong Kong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,344,201 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong within Mexican American Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.111. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Mexican American Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Hong Kong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Mexican American Indians corresponds to a decrease of 8.5 Immigrants from Hong Kong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($37,407 compared to $56,709, a difference of 51.6%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,066 compared to $128,140, a difference of 50.6%), and median male earnings ($47,990 compared to $70,146, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($51,783 compared to $62,083, a difference of 19.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,089 compared to $71,567, a difference of 27.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 59.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 59.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (19.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 11.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 47.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 32.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 18.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 71.6%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.7%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (83.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.7%), single mother households (7.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 52.4%), and births to unmarried women (35.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 51.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 66.1%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.43 compared to 3.26, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 8.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.8%), no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 88.7%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.7% compared to 52.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 100.7%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 96.2%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 81.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.51%), nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (96.8% compared to 97.3%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Mexican American Indian and Immigrants from Hong Kong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 46.9%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 0.95%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.0% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 7.7%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 11.8%).