Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Transportation & Warehousing
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaAzoresBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Alabama
Compare Cities
Comparison Subject

Map of Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama

0.0%
40.0%
Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama Map

Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama

City % Employed vs State vs National
1. Putnam 38.2% 4.3% (+33.9)#1 4.9% (+33.3)#206
2. Pine Apple 37.5% 4.3% (+33.2)#2 4.9% (+32.6)#216
3. Bristow Cove 36.4% 4.3% (+32.1)#3 4.9% (+31.4)#234
4. Dayton 35.3% 4.3% (+31.0)#4 4.9% (+30.3)#258
5. Gordonville 30.3% 4.3% (+25.9)#5 4.9% (+25.3)#358
6. Akron 26.1% 4.3% (+21.8)#6 4.9% (+21.1)#492
7. Grimes 26.0% 4.3% (+21.7)#7 4.9% (+21.1)#497
8. Needham 25.5% 4.3% (+21.2)#8 4.9% (+20.5)#515
9. Ethelsville 25.4% 4.3% (+21.1)#9 4.9% (+20.5)#519
10. Nances Creek 25.0% 4.3% (+20.7)#10 4.9% (+20.1)#536
11. Eunola 25.0% 4.3% (+20.7)#11 4.9% (+20.1)#540
12. Mcdonald Chapel 23.3% 4.3% (+19.0)#12 4.9% (+18.3)#614
13. Ridgeville 21.7% 4.3% (+17.4)#13 4.9% (+16.7)#712
14. Thomaston 20.9% 4.3% (+16.6)#14 4.9% (+16.0)#760
15. Forkland 19.9% 4.3% (+15.6)#15 4.9% (+14.9)#842
16. Macedonia 19.8% 4.3% (+15.5)#16 4.9% (+14.9)#848
17. Nauvoo 19.6% 4.3% (+15.3)#17 4.9% (+14.7)#864
18. Hackleburg 18.9% 4.3% (+14.6)#18 4.9% (+14.0)#913
19. Memphis 18.2% 4.3% (+13.9)#19 4.9% (+13.2)#1,001
20. Brilliant 18.0% 4.3% (+13.7)#20 4.9% (+13.1)#1,020
21. Garden City 17.9% 4.3% (+13.6)#21 4.9% (+13.0)#1,031
22. Spruce Pine 17.2% 4.3% (+12.9)#22 4.9% (+12.2)#1,133
23. Courtland 17.1% 4.3% (+12.8)#23 4.9% (+12.2)#1,148
24. Libertyville 16.9% 4.3% (+12.6)#24 4.9% (+12.0)#1,169
25. Castleberry 16.9% 4.3% (+12.6)#25 4.9% (+12.0)#1,173
26. Morrison Crossroads 16.8% 4.3% (+12.5)#26 4.9% (+11.9)#1,194
27. Oakman 16.8% 4.3% (+12.5)#27 4.9% (+11.9)#1,200
28. Boykin 15.7% 4.3% (+11.4)#28 4.9% (+10.8)#1,381
29. Grand Bay 15.7% 4.3% (+11.4)#29 4.9% (+10.7)#1,396
30. Pea Ridge 15.6% 4.3% (+11.3)#30 4.9% (+10.7)#1,406
31. Clayhatchee 15.2% 4.3% (+10.9)#31 4.9% (+10.3)#1,489
32. White Hall 15.1% 4.3% (+10.8)#32 4.9% (+10.1)#1,521
33. Point Clear 14.9% 4.3% (+10.6)#33 4.9% (+9.97)#1,555
34. Rogersville 14.9% 4.3% (+10.6)#34 4.9% (+9.92)#1,569
35. Newton 14.8% 4.3% (+10.5)#35 4.9% (+9.83)#1,593
36. Dodge City 14.3% 4.3% (+9.98)#36 4.9% (+9.34)#1,709
37. Hayneville 13.7% 4.3% (+9.39)#37 4.9% (+8.75)#1,873
38. Madrid 13.6% 4.3% (+9.33)#38 4.9% (+8.69)#1,889
39. Bon Secour 13.3% 4.3% (+9.02)#39 4.9% (+8.38)#1,982
40. Cullomburg 13.2% 4.3% (+8.90)#40 4.9% (+8.26)#2,014
41. Banks 13.2% 4.3% (+8.85)#41 4.9% (+8.21)#2,029
42. Mount Olive Cdp Jefferson County 13.1% 4.3% (+8.75)#42 4.9% (+8.11)#2,060
43. Hodges 12.9% 4.3% (+8.60)#43 4.9% (+7.96)#2,113
44. Thomasville 12.6% 4.3% (+8.31)#44 4.9% (+7.67)#2,213
45. Huguley 12.6% 4.3% (+8.26)#45 4.9% (+7.62)#2,226
46. Ray 12.4% 4.3% (+8.14)#46 4.9% (+7.50)#2,289
47. Fulton 12.4% 4.3% (+8.13)#47 4.9% (+7.49)#2,296
48. Mentone 12.3% 4.3% (+7.96)#48 4.9% (+7.32)#2,358
49. Lipscomb 12.1% 4.3% (+7.83)#49 4.9% (+7.19)#2,415
50. Langston 11.8% 4.3% (+7.52)#50 4.9% (+6.88)#2,530
51. Edwardsville 11.8% 4.3% (+7.52)#51 4.9% (+6.88)#2,531
52. Red Level 11.8% 4.3% (+7.51)#52 4.9% (+6.87)#2,536
53. Warrior 11.8% 4.3% (+7.46)#53 4.9% (+6.82)#2,551
54. River Falls 11.7% 4.3% (+7.42)#54 4.9% (+6.78)#2,586
55. Hobson City 11.5% 4.3% (+7.17)#55 4.9% (+6.53)#2,698
56. Hollywood 11.4% 4.3% (+7.09)#56 4.9% (+6.45)#2,744
57. Samson 10.9% 4.3% (+6.55)#57 4.9% (+5.91)#3,025
58. Coffeeville 10.8% 4.3% (+6.50)#58 4.9% (+5.86)#3,040
59. Elmore 10.8% 4.3% (+6.46)#59 4.9% (+5.82)#3,078
60. Beatrice 10.5% 4.3% (+6.22)#60 4.9% (+5.58)#3,200
61. Gilbertown 10.4% 4.3% (+6.12)#61 4.9% (+5.48)#3,265
62. Florala 10.3% 4.3% (+6.00)#62 4.9% (+5.36)#3,342
63. Leesburg 10.0% 4.3% (+5.69)#63 4.9% (+5.05)#3,525
64. Gu Win 9.9% 4.3% (+5.55)#64 4.9% (+4.91)#3,640
65. Lincoln 9.8% 4.3% (+5.52)#65 4.9% (+4.88)#3,659
66. Sipsey 9.7% 4.3% (+5.37)#66 4.9% (+4.73)#3,766
67. Mckenzie 9.7% 4.3% (+5.36)#67 4.9% (+4.72)#3,775
68. Addison 9.6% 4.3% (+5.28)#68 4.9% (+4.64)#3,836
69. Ozark 9.6% 4.3% (+5.28)#69 4.9% (+4.64)#3,842
70. Lake View 9.6% 4.3% (+5.26)#70 4.9% (+4.62)#3,862
71. Dutton 9.5% 4.3% (+5.22)#71 4.9% (+4.58)#3,886
72. Mcintosh 9.4% 4.3% (+5.13)#72 4.9% (+4.49)#3,963
73. Waverly 9.4% 4.3% (+5.09)#73 4.9% (+4.46)#3,984
74. Bessemer 9.4% 4.3% (+5.06)#74 4.9% (+4.42)#4,014
75. Hartford 9.3% 4.3% (+4.96)#75 4.9% (+4.32)#4,081
76. Coats Bend 9.3% 4.3% (+4.94)#76 4.9% (+4.30)#4,094
77. Vina 9.2% 4.3% (+4.86)#77 4.9% (+4.22)#4,160
78. Pinckard 9.1% 4.3% (+4.81)#78 4.9% (+4.17)#4,205
79. Enterprise 8.9% 4.3% (+4.63)#79 4.9% (+3.99)#4,365
80. Powell 8.8% 4.3% (+4.53)#80 4.9% (+3.89)#4,459
81. Wilton 8.8% 4.3% (+4.49)#81 4.9% (+3.85)#4,500
82. Hillsboro 8.7% 4.3% (+4.43)#82 4.9% (+3.79)#4,557
83. Sumiton 8.7% 4.3% (+4.41)#83 4.9% (+3.77)#4,578
84. Chickasaw 8.6% 4.3% (+4.31)#84 4.9% (+3.67)#4,686
85. Coaling 8.6% 4.3% (+4.26)#85 4.9% (+3.62)#4,737
86. Vandiver 8.5% 4.3% (+4.21)#86 4.9% (+3.58)#4,775
87. Attalla 8.5% 4.3% (+4.21)#87 4.9% (+3.57)#4,781
88. Triana 8.4% 4.3% (+4.07)#88 4.9% (+3.43)#4,925
89. Hollis Crossroads 8.4% 4.3% (+4.06)#89 4.9% (+3.42)#4,935
90. Shelby 8.4% 4.3% (+4.06)#90 4.9% (+3.42)#4,938
91. Beaverton 8.3% 4.3% (+4.03)#91 4.9% (+3.39)#4,982
92. Geneva 8.3% 4.3% (+4.00)#92 4.9% (+3.36)#5,026
93. Clay 8.3% 4.3% (+3.97)#93 4.9% (+3.33)#5,053
94. Midland City 8.2% 4.3% (+3.86)#94 4.9% (+3.22)#5,169
95. Lockhart 8.2% 4.3% (+3.86)#95 4.9% (+3.22)#5,170
96. Troy 8.1% 4.3% (+3.83)#96 4.9% (+3.19)#5,195
97. Evergreen 8.1% 4.3% (+3.82)#97 4.9% (+3.18)#5,207
98. New Brockton 8.1% 4.3% (+3.77)#98 4.9% (+3.13)#5,265
99. Gaylesville 8.1% 4.3% (+3.76)#99 4.9% (+3.12)#5,280
100. Tallassee 8.0% 4.3% (+3.73)#100 4.9% (+3.09)#5,326

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama?
Top 10 Cities with the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama are:
#1
38.2%
#2
37.5%
#3
36.4%
#4
35.3%
#5
30.3%
#6
26.1%
#7
26.0%
#8
25.5%
#9
25.4%
#10
25.0%
What city has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama?
Putnam has the Highest Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama with 38.2%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the State of Alabama?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in Alabama is 4.3%.
What is the Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the United States?
Percentage of Population Employed in Transportation & Warehousing in the United States is 4.9%.