Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Highest Poverty | Female
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAleutAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBulgarianBurmeseCajunCanadianCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMalaysianMexicanMexican American IndianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBrazilBurma / MyanmarCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCosta RicaCubaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Tulsa
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa

7.9%
35.4%
Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK

Zip Code Female Poverty vs State vs National
1. 74110 35.4% 16.5% (+18.9)#23 13.7% (+21.7)#1,750
2. 74106 34.4% 16.5% (+17.9)#29 13.7% (+20.7)#1,923
3. 74126 33.7% 16.5% (+17.2)#33 13.7% (+20.0)#2,035
4. 74130 30.7% 16.5% (+14.2)#46 13.7% (+17.0)#2,635
5. 74115 28.7% 16.5% (+12.2)#69 13.7% (+15.0)#3,174
6. 74146 28.4% 16.5% (+11.9)#75 13.7% (+14.7)#3,245
7. 74104 27.6% 16.5% (+11.1)#87 13.7% (+13.9)#3,493
8. 74108 26.3% 16.5% (+9.82)#109 13.7% (+12.6)#3,960
9. 74107 25.9% 16.5% (+9.39)#114 13.7% (+12.2)#4,108
10. 74128 24.1% 16.5% (+7.57)#148 13.7% (+10.4)#4,879
11. 74116 23.9% 16.5% (+7.41)#150 13.7% (+10.2)#4,965
12. 74129 23.7% 16.5% (+7.18)#155 13.7% (+9.98)#5,080
13. 74127 22.6% 16.5% (+6.12)#172 13.7% (+8.92)#5,595
14. 74136 20.5% 16.5% (+4.04)#220 13.7% (+6.84)#6,905
15. 74103 20.4% 16.5% (+3.86)#223 13.7% (+6.66)#7,014
16. 74112 20.0% 16.5% (+3.46)#234 13.7% (+6.26)#7,290
17. 74105 17.1% 16.5% (+0.643)#316 13.7% (+3.44)#9,621
18. 74119 16.6% 16.5% (+0.068)#337 13.7% (+2.87)#10,205
19. 74131 14.0% 16.5% (-2.47)#408 13.7% (+0.329)#13,000
20. 74145 13.9% 16.5% (-2.57)#410 13.7% (+0.229)#13,131
21. 74135 13.6% 16.5% (-2.85)#416 13.7% (-0.054)#13,475
22. 74120 13.3% 16.5% (-3.22)#429 13.7% (-0.424)#13,961
23. 74134 12.2% 16.5% (-4.30)#463 13.7% (-1.50)#15,396
24. 74133 9.6% 16.5% (-6.94)#524 13.7% (-4.14)#19,268
25. 74114 8.4% 16.5% (-8.10)#545 13.7% (-5.30)#21,164
26. 74137 7.9% 16.5% (-8.62)#554 13.7% (-5.82)#21,981
27. 74132 7.9% 16.5% (-8.63)#555 13.7% (-5.83)#21,994

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK are:
#1
35.4%
#2
34.4%
#3
33.7%
#4
30.7%
#5
28.7%
#6
28.4%
#7
27.6%
#8
26.3%
#9
25.9%
#10
24.1%
What zip code has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK?
74110 has the Highest Female Poverty Level in Tulsa, OK with 35.4%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa, OK?
Poverty Level Among Females in Tulsa is 19.7%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma?
Poverty Level Among Females in Oklahoma is 16.5%.
What is the Poverty Level Among Females in the United States?
Poverty Level Among Females in the United States is 13.7%.