Immigrants from Kazakhstan vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,405,759 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Kazakhstan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.519. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Kazakhstan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 9.690% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Kazakhstan corresponds to an increase of 9,690.4 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,747 compared to $42,180, a difference of 15.6%), median female earnings ($42,386 compared to $37,531, a difference of 12.9%), and median earnings ($50,225 compared to $45,197, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,292 compared to $58,847, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($53,990 compared to $50,336, a difference of 7.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($107,378 compared to $98,091, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 18.5%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 18.0%), and single father poverty (15.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.57%), male poverty (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and poverty (12.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.2%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 17.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.26%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.94%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (28.1% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.17 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.73%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 92.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 33.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 29.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.6% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 7.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 18.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 29.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 34.7%), master's degree (18.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 30.1%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.050%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.9% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and 11th grade (93.1% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.27%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Kazakhstan and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 54.2%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.76%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 3.5%).