Immigrants from Sri Lanka vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 149,700,552 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Sri Lanka communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sri Lanka within a typical geography, there is an increase of 3.342% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sri Lanka corresponds to an increase of 3,342.3 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($99,943 compared to $82,029, a difference of 21.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($119,094 compared to $98,091, a difference of 21.4%), and median family income ($120,263 compared to $99,800, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,512 compared to $50,336, a difference of 8.3%), and median male earnings ($63,099 compared to $53,925, a difference of 17.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 25.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.8%), and single male poverty (11.8% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.14%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 23.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.9% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.20%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.63%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 18.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.64%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 22.4%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and divorced or separated (10.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.10%), married-couple households (48.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.17%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 20.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 4.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 59.1%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 51.4%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 44.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.2% compared to 93.3%, a difference of 0.13%), high school diploma (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and 12th grade, no diploma (92.1% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sri Lanka and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 36.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 33.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 0.78%), disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.9%).