Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty
COMPARE
Immigrants from China
White/Caucasian
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Immigrants from China
Whites/Caucasians
12.5%
FEMALE POVERTY
94.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
102nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
54.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
171st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from China vs White/Caucasian Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 456,442,741 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.210 and weighted average of 12.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 583,112,868 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.887 and weighted average of 13.4%, a difference of 6.9%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Immigrants from China | White/Caucasian |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 10.3% |
| Maximum | 26.5% | 33.9% |
| Range | 23.9% | 23.6% |
| Mean | 11.9% | 16.7% |
| Median | 11.5% | 16.5% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.7% | 12.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.0% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.3% | 7.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.1% | 4.7% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Slavic (12.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Palestinian (12.5%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Latvia (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), Tlingit-Haida (12.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and Scottish (12.5%, a difference of 0.22%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | South Africa | 95.4 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| British | 95.2 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Australians | 95.2 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Native Hawaiians | 95.1 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Romanians | 95.1 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 94.8 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Tlingit-Haida | 94.8 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | China | 94.5 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Slavs | 94.5 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Palestinians | 94.3 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Scottish | 94.1 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Immigrants | Turkey | 93.8 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Laotians | 93.4 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Portuguese | 93.1 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 12.6% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 93.1 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 12.6% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mongolian (13.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Colombian (13.4%, a difference of 0.11%), Lebanese (13.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Aleut (13.4%, a difference of 0.21%), and Immigrants from Chile (13.3%, a difference of 0.27%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 50.8 /100 | #173 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Iraq | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 13.4% |
| Celtics | 49.9 /100 | #175 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Spain | 49.9 /100 | #176 | Average 13.4% |
| Immigrants | Morocco | 49.4 /100 | #177 | Average 13.4% |
| Israelis | 49.1 /100 | #178 | Average 13.5% |