Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 195,454,658 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.092% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,092.3 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $42,180, a difference of 22.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,888 compared to $91,668, a difference of 16.6%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $99,800, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 4.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $50,336, a difference of 8.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $58,847, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 22.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 21.1%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.31%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 19.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 18.9%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.6%), births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.14 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.060%), currently married (48.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.51%), and married-couple households (47.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 67.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 27.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 5.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 12.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 42.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 34.5%), and master's degree (18.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.7%, a difference of 0.10%), 9th grade (95.7% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 38.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.2% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.5%).