Immigrants from Oceania vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 305,525,957 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.256% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 255.5 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 11.2%), householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $58,847, a difference of 9.5%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $82,029, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $53,925, a difference of 3.3%), median earnings ($47,617 compared to $45,197, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $98,091, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.9%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 16.8%), and single female poverty (20.7% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.080%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and female poverty (13.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.030%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.51%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 8.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.14, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.27%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 38.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.6%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 12.1%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.64%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.65%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.9%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 1.1%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.5%).