Immigrants from South Africa vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 233,322,871 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from South Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.226. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Africa within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.351% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Africa corresponds to a decrease of 351.4 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,465 compared to $42,180, a difference of 22.0%), median household income ($95,800 compared to $82,029, a difference of 16.8%), and median male earnings ($62,899 compared to $53,925, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.050%), householder income under 25 years ($51,705 compared to $50,336, a difference of 2.7%), and median female earnings ($42,508 compared to $37,531, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 15.6%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.29%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.010%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.090%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.89%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (29.3% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.25%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.14, a difference of 0.47%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 39.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 18.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 15.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.1%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.1%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.8% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.15%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.15%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Africa and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 43.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.3%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (45.3% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 11.9%).