Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison
COMPARE
Malaysian
White/Caucasian
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Malaysians
Whites/Caucasians
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,140
SOCIAL INDEX
48.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
185th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
White/Caucasian Integration in Malaysian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,119,656 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.268. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.797% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 796.8 Whites/Caucasians.
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 13.9%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $42,180, a difference of 7.6%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $53,925, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,298 compared to $37,531, a difference of 0.62%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $58,847, a difference of 1.0%), and median household income ($81,064 compared to $82,029, a difference of 1.2%).
Income Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $39,194 | Poor $42,180 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,230 | Poor $99,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $81,064 | Poor $82,029 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $43,844 | Poor $45,197 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,772 | Fair $53,925 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $37,298 | Tragic $37,531 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,615 | Tragic $50,336 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $88,291 | Poor $91,668 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $94,517 | Fair $98,091 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $58,244 | Tragic $58,847 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 28.5% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.9%), receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 0.51%), child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Poverty Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
Poverty | Tragic 13.1% | Average 12.3% |
Families | Poor 9.6% | Good 8.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.0% | Average 11.1% |
Females | Tragic 14.3% | Average 13.4% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.9% | Tragic 20.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.7% | Tragic 14.7% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 18.4% | Poor 18.1% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 17.5% | Average 16.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 17.6% | Average 16.5% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 17.8% | Average 16.6% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 14.5% |
Single Females | Tragic 22.2% | Tragic 22.7% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.9% | Tragic 18.4% |
Single Mothers | Poor 29.7% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Fair 5.4% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.8% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.7% | Excellent 11.1% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 12.7%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%).
Unemployment Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
Unemployment | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Excellent 11.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 17.0% | Exceptional 16.8% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Excellent 10.1% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Poor 6.9% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Average 5.5% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Fair 4.7% | Good 4.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Average 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Average 5.4% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.1% |
Seniors > 75 | Poor 8.9% | Tragic 10.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Fair 7.7% | Tragic 8.4% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.6% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Fair 5.5% | Excellent 5.3% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 4.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.28%).
Labor Participation Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.1% | Tragic 63.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.5% | Tragic 78.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 39.7% | Exceptional 41.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.2% | Exceptional 76.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Average 84.6% | Tragic 84.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.1% | Tragic 83.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.8% | Tragic 83.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.0% | Tragic 81.9% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 19.6%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.2%), and family households with children (29.8% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 1.2%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.0%).
Family Structure Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 65.1% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.8% | Average 27.4% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.31 | Tragic 3.14 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.7% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Good 6.1% |
Currently Married | Poor 45.9% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.4% | Tragic 12.6% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.9% | Poor 33.3% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 4.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.18%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 1.6%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.3% | Exceptional 93.1% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 59.8% | Exceptional 60.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.6% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 7.4% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.7%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.7%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 1.2%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 1.6% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.2% | Exceptional 98.4% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.1% | Exceptional 98.4% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Exceptional 98.1% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.7% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.0% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.5% | Exceptional 96.7% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.5% | Exceptional 95.8% |
10th Grade | Tragic 92.2% | Exceptional 94.7% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.8% | Exceptional 93.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.2% | Exceptional 91.8% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.0% | Exceptional 90.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.3% | Good 86.2% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 62.2% | Poor 64.0% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 55.6% | Tragic 57.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 41.6% | Tragic 44.2% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 35.3% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 13.8% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.4% | Poor 4.1% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Fair 1.8% |
Malaysian vs White/Caucasian Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 28.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 15.8%), and male disability (11.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Disability Metric | Malaysian | White/Caucasian |
Disability | Tragic 12.2% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Females | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Tragic 1.7% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.2% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 12.5% | Tragic 12.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.4% | Tragic 24.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Average 47.3% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.4% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.7% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.9% | Exceptional 17.0% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.5% | Tragic 2.6% |