Finnish vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,917,985 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Finnish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Finns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.156% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Finns corresponds to an increase of 156.5 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,610 compared to $91,668, a difference of 3.2%), per capita income ($43,461 compared to $42,180, a difference of 3.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,827 compared to $50,336, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.6% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 0.26%), householder income over 65 years ($59,535 compared to $58,847, a difference of 1.2%), and median male earnings ($54,721 compared to $53,925, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 15.9%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.030%), single mother poverty (30.0% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and single female poverty (21.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.9% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and female unemployment (4.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.7% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.1% compared to 81.9%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.92%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 0.97%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 7.6%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 5.1%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.8% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.31%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.48%), and married-couple households (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.94%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.87%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 0.71%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.3% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.7%), associate's degree (46.3% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and college, 1 year or more (60.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Finnish and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.1%), ambulatory disability (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.1%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 24.2%, a difference of 5.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and male disability (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.8%).