Immigrants from Poland vs White/Caucasian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,861,916 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians within Immigrant from Poland communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Poland within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.427% in Whites/Caucasians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Poland corresponds to an increase of 426.6 Whites/Caucasians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($41,630 compared to $37,531, a difference of 10.9%), median household income ($90,549 compared to $82,029, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($101,065 compared to $91,668, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,041 compared to $58,847, a difference of 3.7%), wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 28.5%, a difference of 6.6%), and median male earnings ($58,452 compared to $53,925, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.0%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.4%), and single female poverty (18.5% compared to 22.7%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.24%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and receiving food stamps (10.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.6% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.9%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.6%), births to unmarried women (28.9% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.90%), and currently married (48.1% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 50.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 26.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 93.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.6% compared to 60.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 21.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 27.4%), master's degree (15.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 11.1%), and bachelor's degree (39.0% compared to 35.3%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (86.3% compared to 86.2%, a difference of 0.20%), 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 91.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Poland and White/Caucasian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 30.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.4% compared to 47.3%, a difference of 4.3%), cognitive disability (16.1% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 7.9%).