Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Bangladesh
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Bangladesh

Navajo

Poor
Poor
2,108
SOCIAL INDEX
18.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
269th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Bangladesh Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,674,645 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Bangladesh communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.090. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Bangladesh within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.017% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Bangladesh corresponds to a decrease of 17.4 Navajo.
Immigrants from Bangladesh Integration in Navajo Communities

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,709 compared to $29,031, a difference of 43.7%), median household income ($80,722 compared to $59,159, a difference of 36.4%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,448 compared to $66,529, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (20.9% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income over 65 years ($55,394 compared to $47,722, a difference of 16.1%), and median female earnings ($39,910 compared to $33,046, a difference of 20.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
Per Capita Income
Poor
$41,709
Tragic
$29,031
Median Family Income
Tragic
$94,665
Tragic
$70,989
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,722
Tragic
$59,159
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,532
Tragic
$36,999
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$51,642
Tragic
$42,098
Median Female Earnings
Good
$39,910
Tragic
$33,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,714
Tragic
$42,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$90,448
Tragic
$66,529
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$92,208
Tragic
$69,759
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$55,394
Tragic
$47,722
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
20.9%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 94.5%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 79.8%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 61.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.8% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 22.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and single mother poverty (31.1% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 29.2%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
Poverty
Tragic
15.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Families
Tragic
11.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Males
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
22.3%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
23.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.8%
Tragic
30.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
20.1%
Tragic
31.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
30.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
30.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.9%
Tragic
30.5%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
31.7%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
29.2%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.1%
Tragic
40.2%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
17.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.9%
Tragic
21.1%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 75.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 64.4%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.050%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (6.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 5.3%), and female unemployment (6.5% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 12.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
Unemployment
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Males
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
21.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.6%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.9%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.1%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.8%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
8.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.6% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 13.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (30.0% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 10.9%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
56.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Tragic
69.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
30.0%
Tragic
32.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
70.6%
Tragic
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.0%
Tragic
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.9%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.7%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.9% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 66.7%), single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 54.0%), and single mother households (6.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 28.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 2.3%), family households (63.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (43.1% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 7.6%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
Family Households
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
43.1%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.36
Exceptional
3.65
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.8%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.6%
Tragic
39.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
30.9%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (25.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 173.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 110.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 78.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 22.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 42.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 78.1%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
25.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
38.8%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
3.9%
Exceptional
8.2%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (15.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 64.1%), bachelor's degree (37.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 60.2%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (85.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.31%), ged/equivalency (81.9% compared to 81.5%, a difference of 0.50%), and 11th grade (89.5% compared to 90.0%, a difference of 0.55%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.8%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.0%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.0%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.0%
Tragic
92.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.5%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Tragic
87.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
85.5%
Tragic
85.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.9%
Tragic
81.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
61.3%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
56.6%
Tragic
50.8%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.2%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Average
37.8%
Tragic
23.6%
Master's Degree
Good
15.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Average
1.8%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Bangladesh and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.85% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 93.4%), hearing disability (2.4% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 91.0%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 5.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Bangladesh vs Navajo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BangladeshNavajo
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
0.85%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.6%
Tragic
33.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
58.3%
Vision
Good
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.8%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%