Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Philippines
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Philippines

Navajo

Average
Poor
6,107
SOCIAL INDEX
58.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
163rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Philippines Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 212,690,137 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.446. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Navajo.
Immigrants from Philippines Integration in Navajo Communities

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,899 compared to $59,159, a difference of 58.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $69,759, a difference of 55.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $66,529, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 10.4%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $33,046, a difference of 24.4%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $36,999, a difference of 30.4%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
Per Capita Income
Average
$44,000
Tragic
$29,031
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,288
Tragic
$70,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,899
Tragic
$59,159
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,266
Tragic
$36,999
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,809
Tragic
$42,098
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,114
Tragic
$33,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$57,930
Tragic
$42,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,910
Tragic
$66,529
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,471
Tragic
$69,759
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,161
Tragic
$47,722
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.7%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 147.8%), family poverty (8.0% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 134.4%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 132.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.5% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 51.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 62.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 67.5%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
Poverty
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
23.1%
Families
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
18.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
22.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
23.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
30.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.0%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
30.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
30.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.4%
Tragic
30.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
10.9%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.6%
Tragic
31.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
29.2%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.5%
Tragic
40.2%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
11.9%
Tragic
19.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
21.1%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 94.3%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 86.6%), and male unemployment (5.4% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 80.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.3%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Males
Poor
5.4%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
7.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.7%
Tragic
29.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Poor
5.7%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Poor
4.8%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Fair
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.9%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
14.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.4%
Tragic
8.2%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 16.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 12.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.9%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.6%
Tragic
56.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.8%
Tragic
69.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
35.1%
Tragic
32.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Average
75.1%
Tragic
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Fair
84.6%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Fair
84.2%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 69.2%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.3%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.7%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
Family Households
Exceptional
68.3%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.37
Exceptional
3.65
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Tragic
8.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
39.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.4%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 10.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.79%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 6.5%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.5%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
60.1%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
23.8%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.5%
Exceptional
8.2%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 54.2%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 44.3%), and associate's degree (45.0% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 38.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.7% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.16%), 10th grade (92.6% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (96.3% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 0.50%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.5%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.4%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.3%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.9%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Tragic
92.3%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.5%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.2%
Tragic
87.1%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.8%
Tragic
85.2%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.8%
Tragic
81.5%
College, Under 1 year
Fair
64.8%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Fair
58.7%
Tragic
50.8%
Associate's Degree
Poor
45.0%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Poor
36.4%
Tragic
23.6%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
9.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.9%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 54.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 49.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.3%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.2%).
Immigrants from Philippines vs Navajo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from PhilippinesNavajo
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Excellent
10.9%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
23.2%
Tragic
33.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.8%
Tragic
58.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Average
3.0%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Tragic
2.9%