Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Hungary
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Navajo
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Hungary

Navajo

Good
Poor
8,157
SOCIAL INDEX
79.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
84th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,296
SOCIAL INDEX
10.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
316th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Navajo Integration in Immigrants from Hungary Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 118,377,206 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Immigrant from Hungary communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.066. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Hungary within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.017% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Hungary corresponds to an increase of 16.8 Navajo.
Immigrants from Hungary Integration in Navajo Communities

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,303 compared to $29,031, a difference of 69.8%), median family income ($111,378 compared to $70,989, a difference of 56.9%), and median household income ($92,094 compared to $59,159, a difference of 55.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 20.8%), householder income under 25 years ($52,798 compared to $42,380, a difference of 24.6%), and median female earnings ($41,820 compared to $33,046, a difference of 26.6%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Income
Income MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,303
Tragic
$29,031
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$111,378
Tragic
$70,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$92,094
Tragic
$59,159
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,227
Tragic
$36,999
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,806
Tragic
$42,098
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,820
Tragic
$33,046
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,798
Tragic
$42,380
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$102,655
Tragic
$66,529
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$108,267
Tragic
$69,759
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,277
Tragic
$47,722
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
22.4%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 141.6%), family poverty (8.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 125.0%), and male poverty (10.7% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 109.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 39.3%), single female poverty (20.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 56.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 57.0%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Families
Excellent
8.4%
Tragic
18.8%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Tragic
22.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
23.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
30.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.0%
Tragic
23.3%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.5%
Tragic
31.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Tragic
30.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
30.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.8%
Tragic
30.5%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
25.3%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.2%
Tragic
31.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Tragic
29.2%
Single Mothers
Good
28.9%
Tragic
40.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
4.9%
Tragic
11.9%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
17.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
19.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
21.1%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 103.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 95.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 89.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 17.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 33.4%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
8.4%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
9.8%
Females
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
7.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.5%
Tragic
29.0%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
16.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.4%
Tragic
12.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
10.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Average
4.8%
Tragic
6.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.9%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Average
5.5%
Tragic
8.2%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 13.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 13.7%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.5%
Tragic
56.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
69.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Fair
36.2%
Tragic
32.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Fair
74.9%
Tragic
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Good
84.8%
Tragic
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Average
84.4%
Tragic
73.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.7%
Tragic
72.8%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.7% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 73.2%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 56.2%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (26.7% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.96%), and family households (63.6% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 4.3%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.7%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
40.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.17
Exceptional
3.65
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.8%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.6%
Tragic
39.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.7%
Tragic
51.5%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 40.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 20.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.0% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 2.1%), and no vehicles in household (11.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 17.7%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.0%
Exceptional
90.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Average
55.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.5%
Exceptional
22.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
8.2%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 89.9%), master's degree (17.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 86.1%), and bachelor's degree (42.3% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.16%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Fair
2.1%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Average
98.0%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Average
98.0%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.1%
Average
97.9%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Average
97.9%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Average
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Fair
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Tragic
96.8%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
92.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
90.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
87.1%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.2%
Tragic
85.2%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.2%
Tragic
81.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.3%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.7%
Tragic
50.8%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.2%
Tragic
32.6%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.3%
Tragic
23.6%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.5%
Tragic
9.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.5%
Tragic
2.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Hungary and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.7% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 53.5%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 50.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.40%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.5%), and female disability (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.0%).
Immigrants from Hungary vs Navajo Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from HungaryNavajo
Disability
Good
11.5%
Tragic
14.3%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
14.4%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.6%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Excellent
5.5%
Exceptional
5.4%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
15.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
33.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
58.3%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
3.1%
Hearing
Poor
3.1%
Tragic
4.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
18.8%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.5%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.9%