Pima vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,204,039 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.141% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to a decrease of 141.4 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $66,529, a difference of 24.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $42,380, a difference of 21.5%), and median family income ($77,431 compared to $70,989, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $42,098, a difference of 0.62%), median earnings ($38,285 compared to $36,999, a difference of 3.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $69,759, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.8% compared to 29.2%, a difference of 97.9%), single male poverty (20.2% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 25.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty (23.6% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and family poverty (18.4% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 33.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.40%), unemployment (8.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 7.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 0.050%), in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.48%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 30.9%), married-couple households (35.6% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 39.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 0.040%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.62%), and family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 49.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 15.2%), college, 1 year or more (45.6% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and college, under 1 year (51.4% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (93.9% compared to 93.9%, a difference of 0.050%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 55.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 24.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 0.16%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability (13.7% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 4.1%).