Lithuanian vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,186,417 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.001. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $29,031, a difference of 70.3%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $70,989, a difference of 62.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $69,759, a difference of 61.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $42,380, a difference of 26.4%), median female earnings ($42,108 compared to $33,046, a difference of 27.4%), and wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 199.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 161.8%), and male poverty (9.5% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 133.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 46.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 62.1%), and single female poverty (19.2% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 64.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 111.5%), male unemployment (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 97.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 96.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 30.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 26.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 18.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 14.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 74.3%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 62.7%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 51.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.4%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.0% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 30.0%), no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (17.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 88.2%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 87.3%), and bachelor's degree (42.2% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.65%), 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), and nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 55.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 54.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 5.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 15.4%).