Burmese vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 210,225,505 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.371. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 3.5 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,005 compared to $29,031, a difference of 79.1%), median household income ($103,145 compared to $59,159, a difference of 74.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $69,759, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 25.3%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $42,380, a difference of 29.3%), and median female earnings ($44,911 compared to $33,046, a difference of 35.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 174.4%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 156.8%), and receiving food stamps (8.6% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 143.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.2% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 53.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 30.3%, a difference of 60.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 65.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 116.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 108.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 105.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 10.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.9%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 32.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 17.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 69.2%, a difference of 16.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 7.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 13.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 95.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.2%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 56.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.95%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.40%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.8%), master's degree (19.7% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 108.9%), and bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 98.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%), and 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.8% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 70.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 68.1%), and hearing disability (2.8% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 65.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 12.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.7%).