Creek vs Navajo Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,729,674 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Navajo within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Navajo. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Navajo.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($35,546 compared to $29,031, a difference of 22.4%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 21.3%), and median family income ($82,560 compared to $70,989, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $33,046, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $42,380, a difference of 7.1%), and median earnings ($39,648 compared to $36,999, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 92.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 67.6%), and family poverty (11.7% compared to 18.8%, a difference of 61.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.7% compared to 40.2%, a difference of 9.6%), single female poverty (27.4% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.2% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 21.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 76.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 74.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.2%), female unemployment (5.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 35.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 32.1%, a difference of 22.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 72.8%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.0% compared to 73.8%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 51.5%, a difference of 37.1%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 25.9%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.7%), family households (64.2% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and married-couple households (45.3% compared to 40.1%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 21.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 55.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 29.9%), bachelor's degree (28.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 22.2%), and associate's degree (37.6% compared to 32.6%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.44%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Navajo communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (6.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 26.3%), disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 58.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 0.21%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and vision disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.9%).