Portuguese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 408,650,023 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.423. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.029% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 29.1 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $68,960, a difference of 21.7%), median household income ($88,976 compared to $106,057, a difference of 19.2%), and median earnings ($48,032 compared to $57,114, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $57,818, a difference of 6.2%), wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $70,103, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 38.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 26.9%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.90%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 26.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 15.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.82%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.9%), and single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.90%), average family size (3.19 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (47.3% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 12.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.080%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 50.1%), master's degree (13.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 48.7%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 45.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 57.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 34.8%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 14.1%).