Belizean vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,545,064 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Belizean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Belizeans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.416% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Belizeans corresponds to a decrease of 415.7 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($48,358 compared to $68,960, a difference of 42.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,684 compared to $124,188, a difference of 40.0%), and median family income ($90,880 compared to $125,956, a difference of 38.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,094 compared to $57,818, a difference of 13.2%), median female earnings ($37,429 compared to $46,324, a difference of 23.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($54,580 compared to $70,103, a difference of 28.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 67.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 58.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 11.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (31.0% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 37.9%), male unemployment (6.5% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 36.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.7%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 50.1%), single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 32.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.39 compared to 3.23, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.3% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 67.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.0% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 2.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (85.7% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 88.6%), master's degree (12.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 66.8%), and professional degree (3.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 65.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Belizean and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 35.0%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.5%), and ambulatory disability (6.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 6.9%), disability age over 75 (49.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and cognitive disability (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.8%).