Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Burmese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Burmese

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Exceptional
Exceptional
10,002
SOCIAL INDEX
97.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
4th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Burmese Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 425,877,749 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to a decrease of 6.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Burmese Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($65,236 compared to $68,960, a difference of 5.7%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $57,818, a difference of 5.5%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($52,005 compared to $52,660, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $70,103, a difference of 1.5%), and median family income ($123,369 compared to $125,956, a difference of 2.1%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,005
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$123,369
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$103,145
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$54,559
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$65,236
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$44,911
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,800
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$113,701
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$121,444
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,139
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.0%
Tragic
29.3%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 7.5%), single male poverty (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.3%), and single father poverty (15.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 0.21%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 0.25%), and family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
18.3%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.5%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.2%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.8%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 5.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.15%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.53%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 0.20%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.2%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.3%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.5%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.6%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.3%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.7%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Exceptional
84.0%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (26.4% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 6.8%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.37%), family households (65.7% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (49.8% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.8%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
26.4%
Exceptional
24.7%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 13.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 6.8%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.6%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
6.8%
Fair
6.1%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.1%), and bachelor's degree (46.9% compared to 48.3%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.3% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.0%), 11th grade (93.6% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.0%), and 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Excellent
98.1%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Excellent
98.1%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Excellent
98.0%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Good
97.9%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Excellent
97.5%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.3%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Excellent
96.3%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.1%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.3%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.9%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
54.6%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.9%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.7%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 9.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and male disability (10.0% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.16%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.87%).
Burmese vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricBurmeseImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Exceptional
10.7%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
20.6%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.9%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.8%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.2%