Barbadian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 138,364,104 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Barbadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.210. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Barbadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.259% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Barbadians corresponds to a decrease of 259.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 54.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,266 compared to $124,188, a difference of 37.6%), and median male earnings ($51,236 compared to $68,960, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,202 compared to $57,818, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($41,261 compared to $46,324, a difference of 12.3%), and per capita income ($42,406 compared to $52,660, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (16.5% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 86.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (20.0% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 60.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 17.5%), single father poverty (17.5% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 20.6%), and single mother poverty (30.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (6.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 43.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 39.6%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (22.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 49.8%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 46.5%), and married-couple households (39.4% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.9%), family households (62.5% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (26.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 204.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 56.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 53.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (74.0% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 23.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (38.3% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 47.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 53.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 63.2%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 42.5%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Barbadian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 33.0%), ambulatory disability (6.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 32.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 0.86%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 4.5%).