Malaysian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 217,791,959 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.055% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to a decrease of 55.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $68,960, a difference of 35.8%), per capita income ($39,194 compared to $52,660, a difference of 34.4%), and median family income ($95,230 compared to $125,956, a difference of 32.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $57,818, a difference of 12.0%), wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $70,103, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 43.9%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 40.1%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 39.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 14.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 38.9%), births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 37.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.8% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 0.74%), family households (65.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 0.83%), and average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 17.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.91%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 5.8%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 80.6%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 73.8%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.79%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 40.8%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 30.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%).