Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Native Hawaiian
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Native Hawaiians
Immigrants from South Central Asia
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,673,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $68,960, a difference of 31.8%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $52,660, a difference of 28.4%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $57,114, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $70,103, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $57,818, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 15.3%).
| Income Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,017 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Good $104,910 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,919 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Poor $45,027 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Poor $52,306 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Tragic $38,461 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $55,158 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Average $95,058 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $105,149 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $71,021 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.4% | Tragic 29.3% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
| Poverty Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 8.3% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Excellent 10.7% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 17.9% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Good 13.2% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 16.2% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.2% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.5% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Good 12.6% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Excellent 28.4% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
| Unemployment Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Fair 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Good 5.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.3% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 10.6% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Excellent 5.3% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 64.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 79.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Excellent 37.4% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.0% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.9% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 68.4% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Average 27.4% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.1% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.43 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Exceptional 47.9% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 34.3% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.7% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 92.4% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.4% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 24.9% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.4% | Fair 6.1% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Education Level Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.9% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.9% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.5% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Poor 63.9% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 57.6% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.1% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 12.3% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.8%), male disability (12.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
| Disability Metric | Native Hawaiian | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Tragic 12.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Poor 12.4% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.3% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Average 6.6% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 24.1% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 48.3% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Fair 2.2% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Exceptional 16.7% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Tragic 6.5% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |