Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

COMPARE

Native Hawaiian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Native Hawaiians

Immigrants from South Central Asia

Average
Exceptional
6,131
SOCIAL INDEX
58.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
162nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Native Hawaiian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 308,673,263 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Native Hawaiian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Native Hawaiians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.012% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Native Hawaiians corresponds to a decrease of 12.2 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Native Hawaiian Integration in Immigrants from South Central Asia Communities

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($52,306 compared to $68,960, a difference of 31.8%), per capita income ($41,017 compared to $52,660, a difference of 28.4%), and median earnings ($45,027 compared to $57,114, a difference of 26.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($71,021 compared to $70,103, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($55,158 compared to $57,818, a difference of 4.8%), and wage/income gap (25.4% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 15.3%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
Income MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,017
Exceptional
$52,660
Median Family Income
Good
$104,910
Exceptional
$125,956
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,919
Exceptional
$106,057
Median Earnings
Poor
$45,027
Exceptional
$57,114
Median Male Earnings
Poor
$52,306
Exceptional
$68,960
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,461
Exceptional
$46,324
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$55,158
Exceptional
$57,818
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Average
$95,058
Exceptional
$116,626
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$105,149
Exceptional
$124,188
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$71,021
Exceptional
$70,103
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.4%
Tragic
29.3%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.8% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 45.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.2% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 22.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.9% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 1.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.4% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 7.4%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
Poverty MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Families
Exceptional
8.3%
Exceptional
7.2%
Males
Excellent
10.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Females
Exceptional
12.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
17.9%
Exceptional
17.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Good
13.2%
Exceptional
10.8%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.2%
Exceptional
13.3%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.2%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
12.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.5%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Exceptional
10.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.9%
Exceptional
17.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
14.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.4%
Exceptional
25.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Exceptional
9.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
8.8%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 30.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.0%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Unemployment
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Females
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
16.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
10.6%
Excellent
10.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.1%
Exceptional
6.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
5.3%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.2%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
7.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.4% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
67.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
79.1%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Excellent
37.4%
Tragic
34.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.4%
Tragic
74.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.3%
Exceptional
84.0%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 39.0%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.0%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.4% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 3.0%), married-couple households (49.1% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and currently married (47.9% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.4%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Family Households
Exceptional
68.4%
Exceptional
66.4%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
30.0%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
49.1%
Exceptional
50.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.43
Average
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.0%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Exceptional
5.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.9%
Exceptional
50.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Exceptional
10.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.3%
Exceptional
24.7%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 53.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (24.9% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.0%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.4% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
8.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.4%
Exceptional
91.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
56.6%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
24.9%
Fair
19.3%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.4%
Fair
6.1%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (12.3% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 68.8%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 66.3%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (90.8% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and 11th grade (93.9% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
Education Level MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Good
2.0%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Good
97.9%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Good
97.8%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Good
97.6%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Good
97.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Good
97.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.9%
Excellent
96.3%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Exceptional
95.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Exceptional
94.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.9%
Exceptional
93.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.6%
Exceptional
92.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.8%
Exceptional
90.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Exceptional
72.1%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.6%
Exceptional
67.1%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.1%
Exceptional
55.7%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
33.2%
Exceptional
48.3%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
20.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Exceptional
5.9%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.6%

Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native Hawaiian and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 42.8%), male disability (12.5% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.1%), disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 5.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Native Hawaiian vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
Disability MetricNative HawaiianImmigrants from South Central Asia
Disability
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.9%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
9.4%
Females
Poor
12.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.0%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Poor
11.7%
Exceptional
8.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Exceptional
20.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.3%
Exceptional
46.0%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.6%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.4%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.5%
Exceptional
5.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.2%