Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Latvia
Immigrants from South Central Asia
8,665
SOCIAL INDEX
84.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
59th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Latvia Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,106,861 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.547% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to a decrease of 547.1 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($93,602 compared to $106,057, a difference of 13.3%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $68,960, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $57,818, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($50,914 compared to $52,660, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($43,099 compared to $46,324, a difference of 7.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $70,103, a difference of 9.0%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,914 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Exceptional $114,826 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Exceptional $93,602 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,555 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,422 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $43,099 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,737 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,522 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,454 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $64,298 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 26.7% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 17.7%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and receiving food stamps (10.3% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and single female poverty (19.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.6%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Exceptional 11.5% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Exceptional 7.9% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.5% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.6% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Exceptional 12.2% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.8% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.7% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Excellent 10.5% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Good 12.0% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.3% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.86%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Good 6.6% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Good 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Poor 4.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Average 4.9% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.73%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.1% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Good 36.8% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Average 75.0% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.9% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.0% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.1% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 17.9%), family households with children (25.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.2%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 1.5%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.0%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Tragic 62.0% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.9% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Fair 46.0% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Tragic 3.13 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Exceptional 1.9% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.6% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 29.1% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 41.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 3.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 11.2%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 88.1% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.2% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 17.4% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 10.3%), master's degree (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.7%), and no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.6% compared to 92.6%, a difference of 0.010%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.030%), and 11th grade (93.8% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 0.15%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Exceptional 95.6% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Exceptional 93.8% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.6% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.9% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.1% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Exceptional 52.8% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 45.1% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Exceptional 19.1% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Latvia vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 21.3%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 20.6%), and ambulatory disability (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 0.45%), cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 4.9%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Latvia | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.4% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Excellent 10.9% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.8% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.3% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Poor 3.1% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Good 6.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Exceptional 2.2% |