Samoan vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 214,039,106 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.042. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 7.6 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($51,389 compared to $68,960, a difference of 34.2%), per capita income ($39,826 compared to $52,660, a difference of 32.2%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $57,114, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $57,818, a difference of 5.9%), householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $70,103, a difference of 7.1%), and wage/income gap (26.0% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.1% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 36.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 25.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 33.5%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 32.2%), and single mother households (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.5% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 1.8%), family households (67.9% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 50.6%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 50.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 29.1%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 84.9%), master's degree (11.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 80.5%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 77.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 36.3%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and male disability (11.9% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 7.7%), cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 16.0%).