Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from South Central Asia
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Ecuador
Immigrants from South Central Asia
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
9,859
SOCIAL INDEX
96.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
6th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Immigrants from South Central Asia Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 262,291,405 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.191. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to a decrease of 42.0 Immigrants from South Central Asia.
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($50,474 compared to $68,960, a difference of 36.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,462 compared to $124,188, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($92,837 compared to $125,956, a difference of 35.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,722 compared to $57,818, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $46,324, a difference of 19.9%), and per capita income ($41,195 compared to $52,660, a difference of 27.8%).
| Income Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Per Capita Income | Tragic $41,195 | Exceptional $52,660 |
| Median Family Income | Tragic $92,837 | Exceptional $125,956 |
| Median Household Income | Tragic $80,341 | Exceptional $106,057 |
| Median Earnings | Tragic $44,462 | Exceptional $57,114 |
| Median Male Earnings | Tragic $50,474 | Exceptional $68,960 |
| Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,644 | Exceptional $46,324 |
| Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,722 | Exceptional $57,818 |
| Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $89,673 | Exceptional $116,626 |
| Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $91,462 | Exceptional $124,188 |
| Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,030 | Exceptional $70,103 |
| Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.5% | Tragic 29.3% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 70.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (19.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 56.8%), and married-couple family poverty (6.7% compared to 4.3%, a difference of 56.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 8.9%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 12.4%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 14.8%).
| Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Poverty | Tragic 14.3% | Exceptional 10.2% |
| Families | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Males | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 9.3% |
| Females | Tragic 15.6% | Exceptional 11.1% |
| Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Exceptional 17.6% |
| Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 10.8% |
| Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.6% | Exceptional 13.3% |
| Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.4% | Exceptional 12.5% |
| Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.8% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Exceptional 12.7% |
| Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Exceptional 10.9% |
| Single Females | Tragic 22.0% | Exceptional 17.8% |
| Single Fathers | Average 16.3% | Exceptional 14.5% |
| Single Mothers | Tragic 31.3% | Exceptional 25.3% |
| Married Couples | Tragic 6.7% | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.4% | Exceptional 9.7% |
| Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 11.4% |
| Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 33.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 32.8%), and male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.9%).
| Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Males | Tragic 6.2% | Exceptional 4.8% |
| Females | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 11.2% |
| Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.9% | Exceptional 16.2% |
| Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Excellent 10.1% |
| Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 6.1% |
| Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
| Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Exceptional 4.1% |
| Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.7% | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.3% |
| Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
| Seniors > 75 | Excellent 8.5% | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.2% | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.6% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Poor 79.3% | Exceptional 80.7% |
| In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 34.6% |
| In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.3% | Tragic 74.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.2% |
| In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 84.3% | Exceptional 85.1% |
| In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Exceptional 85.0% |
| In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.2% | Exceptional 84.0% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 36.7%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 66.4%, a difference of 2.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%), and family households with children (27.7% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 8.4%).
| Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Family Households | Exceptional 64.8% | Exceptional 66.4% |
| Family Households with Children | Excellent 27.7% | Exceptional 30.0% |
| Married-couple Households | Tragic 42.9% | Exceptional 50.6% |
| Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Average 3.23 |
| Single Father Households | Poor 2.4% | Exceptional 2.0% |
| Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.3% | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Currently Married | Tragic 43.2% | Exceptional 50.0% |
| Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.8% | Exceptional 10.4% |
| Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 33.7% | Exceptional 24.7% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 178.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 44.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 44.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 20.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 39.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 44.3%).
| Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Vehicles Available | Tragic 23.8% | Exceptional 8.6% |
| 1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 76.2% | Exceptional 91.5% |
| 2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 40.5% | Exceptional 56.6% |
| 3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 13.4% | Fair 19.3% |
| 4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.2% | Fair 6.1% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 86.6%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 55.0%), and no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 54.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (96.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.1% | Good 2.0% |
| Nursery School | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.0% |
| Kindergarten | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.0% |
| 1st Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Good 98.0% |
| 2nd Grade | Tragic 96.8% | Good 97.9% |
| 3rd Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Good 97.8% |
| 4th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Good 97.6% |
| 5th Grade | Tragic 95.8% | Good 97.5% |
| 6th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Good 97.2% |
| 7th Grade | Tragic 93.7% | Excellent 96.3% |
| 8th Grade | Tragic 93.3% | Excellent 96.1% |
| 9th Grade | Tragic 91.8% | Exceptional 95.4% |
| 10th Grade | Tragic 90.4% | Exceptional 94.5% |
| 11th Grade | Tragic 89.1% | Exceptional 93.6% |
| 12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 87.5% | Exceptional 92.6% |
| High School Diploma | Tragic 84.8% | Exceptional 90.9% |
| GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.0% | Exceptional 88.4% |
| College, Under 1 year | Tragic 58.7% | Exceptional 72.1% |
| College, 1 year or more | Tragic 53.4% | Exceptional 67.1% |
| Associate's Degree | Tragic 42.2% | Exceptional 55.7% |
| Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 34.7% | Exceptional 48.3% |
| Master's Degree | Tragic 13.6% | Exceptional 20.7% |
| Professional Degree | Tragic 3.8% | Exceptional 5.9% |
| Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 2.6% |
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 20.8%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 46.0%, a difference of 3.1%), and hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 4.3%).
| Disability Metric | Immigrants from Ecuador | Immigrants from South Central Asia |
| Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Exceptional 9.9% |
| Males | Exceptional 10.4% | Exceptional 9.4% |
| Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Exceptional 10.5% |
| Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Exceptional 1.0% |
| Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.7% | Exceptional 5.7% |
| Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Exceptional 8.9% |
| Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.7% | Exceptional 20.6% |
| Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Exceptional 46.0% |
| Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Exceptional 1.8% |
| Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.6% |
| Cognitive | Good 17.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
| Ambulatory | Average 6.1% | Exceptional 5.1% |
| Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Exceptional 2.2% |