Cypriot vs Immigrants from South Central Asia Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,465,489 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Central Asia within Cypriot communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.115. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Cypriots within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.450% in Immigrants from South Central Asia. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Cypriots corresponds to a decrease of 450.4 Immigrants from South Central Asia.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,209 compared to $57,818, a difference of 10.7%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.5%), and median male earnings ($65,549 compared to $68,960, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,364 compared to $116,626, a difference of 0.23%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($123,396 compared to $124,188, a difference of 0.64%), and median family income ($127,064 compared to $125,956, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 12.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 10.0%), and single father poverty (15.9% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.44%), family poverty (7.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.6% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 20.8%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 15.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (33.8% compared to 34.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 74.0%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (84.1% compared to 84.0%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.9% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 16.0%), births to unmarried women (27.0% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and single father households (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 0.49%), average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.7% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 82.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.4% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.6% compared to 56.6%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 16.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.6%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and master's degree (21.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (72.0% compared to 72.1%, a difference of 0.16%), college, 1 year or more (67.0% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 0.17%), and nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Cypriot and Immigrants from South Central Asia communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 25.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.8%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (20.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.6%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 4.3%).