Alaskan Athabascan vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 45,576,006 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Alaskan Athabascans and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.518 and weighted average of 17.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 446,614,379 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.269 and weighted average of 13.6%, a difference of 29.5%.

Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Alaskan Athabascan	Immigrants from China
Minimum	3.4%	0.83%
Maximum	100.0%	42.3%
Range	96.6%	41.4%
Mean	37.8%	12.6%
Median	24.1%	10.7%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.0%	8.6%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	63.6%	13.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	48.6%	5.3%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	29.5%	7.2%
Standard Deviation (Population)	29.2%	7.1%

Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

Demographics Similar to Alaskan Athabascans by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Alaskan Athabascans are Malaysian (17.6%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Armenia (17.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants (17.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Aleut (17.7%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from Thailand (17.5%, a difference of 0.32%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	13.4 /100 \| #202	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	13.3 /100 \| #203	Poor 17.3%
Ugandans	12.5 /100 \| #204	Poor 17.3%
Immigrants \| Portugal	11.2 /100 \| #205	Poor 17.4%
German Russians	10.9 /100 \| #206	Poor 17.4%
Immigrants \| Thailand	8.2 /100 \| #207	Tragic 17.5%
Malaysians	7.6 /100 \| #208	Tragic 17.6%
Alaskan Athabascans	7.3 /100 \| #209	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Armenia	6.8 /100 \| #210	Tragic 17.6%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	6.7 /100 \| #211	Tragic 17.6%
Aleuts	6.6 /100 \| #212	Tragic 17.7%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	6.0 /100 \| #213	Tragic 17.7%
Panamanians	5.9 /100 \| #214	Tragic 17.7%
Osage	5.8 /100 \| #215	Tragic 17.7%
Moroccans	5.6 /100 \| #216	Tragic 17.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16

In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Turkish (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.17%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.6%, a difference of 0.29%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Okinawans	99.8 /100 \| #25	Exceptional 13.5%
Immigrants \| Bolivia	99.8 /100 \| #26	Exceptional 13.5%
Asians	99.8 /100 \| #27	Exceptional 13.5%
Eastern Europeans	99.8 /100 \| #28	Exceptional 13.5%
Cypriots	99.8 /100 \| #29	Exceptional 13.6%
Swedes	99.8 /100 \| #30	Exceptional 13.6%
Turks	99.8 /100 \| #31	Exceptional 13.6%
Immigrants \| China	99.8 /100 \| #32	Exceptional 13.6%
Danes	99.8 /100 \| #33	Exceptional 13.6%
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs	99.8 /100 \| #34	Exceptional 13.6%
Russians	99.7 /100 \| #35	Exceptional 13.8%
Luxembourgers	99.7 /100 \| #36	Exceptional 13.8%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	99.6 /100 \| #37	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Northern Europe	99.6 /100 \| #38	Exceptional 13.9%
Immigrants \| Australia	99.6 /100 \| #39	Exceptional 13.9%