Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN

RELATED REPORTS & OPTIONS

Walk to Work
Population
Families and Households
Female Fertility
Female Fertility (Unmarried)
Race (Community Size)
Race (Percentage)
Ancestry (Community Size)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Ancestry (Percentage)
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlbanianAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian / Chaldean / SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian / ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYugoslavian
Immigrant Origin (Total)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Immigrant Origin (Percentage)
AfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma / MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Income
Income (Families)
Income (Households)
Poverty
Poverty (Families)
Unemployment
Employment Occupations
Employment Industries
Employer Class
Commute Time
Commute Means
School Enrollment
Education by Degree Field
Occupancy
Finances
Physical Characteristics
Minneapolis
Compare Zip Codes
Comparison Subject

Map of Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis

18.6%
56.5%
Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis Map

Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN

Zip Code % Walk to Work vs State vs National
1. 55443 56.5% 33.4% (+23.1)#114 33.4% (+23.1)#2,395
2. 55446 52.4% 33.4% (+19.0)#191 33.4% (+19.0)#3,696
3. 55439 50.1% 33.4% (+16.7)#227 33.4% (+16.7)#4,534
4. 55420 48.0% 33.4% (+14.6)#264 33.4% (+14.6)#5,285
5. 55426 47.5% 33.4% (+14.1)#275 33.4% (+14.1)#5,468
6. 55412 47.3% 33.4% (+13.9)#280 33.4% (+13.9)#5,565
7. 55449 45.6% 33.4% (+12.2)#303 33.4% (+12.2)#6,164
8. 55428 45.4% 33.4% (+12.0)#306 33.4% (+12.0)#6,266
9. 55424 44.4% 33.4% (+11.0)#320 33.4% (+11.0)#6,646
10. 55433 44.2% 33.4% (+10.8)#323 33.4% (+10.8)#6,721
11. 55406 43.5% 33.4% (+10.1)#336 33.4% (+10.1)#6,964
12. 55411 43.1% 33.4% (+9.70)#344 33.4% (+9.70)#7,132
13. 55413 42.9% 33.4% (+9.50)#345 33.4% (+9.50)#7,193
14. 55419 41.9% 33.4% (+8.50)#360 33.4% (+8.50)#7,581
15. 55436 41.9% 33.4% (+8.50)#361 33.4% (+8.50)#7,588
16. 55416 39.6% 33.4% (+6.20)#402 33.4% (+6.20)#8,521
17. 55417 38.0% 33.4% (+4.60)#423 33.4% (+4.60)#9,221
18. 55421 37.4% 33.4% (+4.00)#441 33.4% (+4.00)#9,503
19. 55418 37.3% 33.4% (+3.90)#442 33.4% (+3.90)#9,546
20. 55427 37.3% 33.4% (+3.90)#443 33.4% (+3.90)#9,550
21. 55422 36.9% 33.4% (+3.50)#448 33.4% (+3.50)#9,706
22. 55410 36.3% 33.4% (+2.90)#453 33.4% (+2.90)#9,970
23. 55445 35.4% 33.4% (+2.00)#466 33.4% (+2.00)#10,398
24. 55401 35.2% 33.4% (+1.80)#470 33.4% (+1.80)#10,474
25. 55431 35.0% 33.4% (+1.60)#472 33.4% (+1.60)#10,526
26. 55409 34.8% 33.4% (+1.40)#478 33.4% (+1.40)#10,627
27. 55425 34.7% 33.4% (+1.30)#482 33.4% (+1.30)#10,672
28. 55437 34.4% 33.4% (+1.00)#493 33.4% (+1.00)#10,823
29. 55403 33.8% 33.4% (+0.400)#499 33.4% (+0.400)#11,049
30. 55404 32.7% 33.4% (-0.700)#513 33.4% (-0.700)#11,494
31. 55407 32.2% 33.4% (-1.20)#524 33.4% (-1.20)#11,713
32. 55402 30.3% 33.4% (-3.10)#539 33.4% (-3.10)#12,528
33. 55423 30.2% 33.4% (-3.20)#540 33.4% (-3.20)#12,534
34. 55405 29.8% 33.4% (-3.60)#543 33.4% (-3.60)#12,668
35. 55447 29.7% 33.4% (-3.70)#548 33.4% (-3.70)#12,719
36. 55415 29.6% 33.4% (-3.80)#552 33.4% (-3.80)#12,774
37. 55454 29.3% 33.4% (-4.10)#555 33.4% (-4.10)#12,896
38. 55408 28.6% 33.4% (-4.80)#562 33.4% (-4.80)#13,132
39. 55441 28.5% 33.4% (-4.90)#566 33.4% (-4.90)#13,187
40. 55429 27.9% 33.4% (-5.50)#571 33.4% (-5.50)#13,357
41. 55430 26.0% 33.4% (-7.40)#588 33.4% (-7.40)#13,982
42. 55435 24.8% 33.4% (-8.60)#599 33.4% (-8.60)#14,337
43. 55432 24.3% 33.4% (-9.10)#606 33.4% (-9.10)#14,494
44. 55434 23.9% 33.4% (-9.50)#609 33.4% (-9.50)#14,582
45. 55448 23.2% 33.4% (-10.2)#613 33.4% (-10.2)#14,844
46. 55414 21.8% 33.4% (-11.6)#624 33.4% (-11.6)#15,367
47. 55438 20.5% 33.4% (-12.9)#640 33.4% (-12.9)#16,086
48. 55455 18.9% 33.4% (-14.5)#649 33.4% (-14.5)#16,566
49. 55444 18.6% 33.4% (-14.8)#651 33.4% (-14.8)#16,618

Common Questions

What are the Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN?
Top 10 Zip Codes with the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN are:
#1
56.5%
#2
52.4%
#3
50.1%
#4
48.0%
#5
47.5%
#6
47.3%
#7
45.6%
#8
45.4%
#9
44.4%
#10
44.2%
What zip code has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN?
55443 has the Highest Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN with 56.5%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis, MN?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minneapolis is 29.7%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in Minnesota is 33.4%.
What is the Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States?
Percentage of Population Walking to Work in the United States is 33.4%.