New Zealander vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,896,057 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.326. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.263% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 262.6 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $44,440, a difference of 13.8%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $85,101, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $94,622, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $50,554, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $102,123, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 11.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.47%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 10.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.29%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.2%, a difference of 0.48%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.8%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 50.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (92.8% compared to 93.0%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 17.5%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 3.1%).