New Zealander vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,911,572 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.064% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 63.6 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $128,723, a difference of 22.5%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $115,509, a difference of 21.4%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $74,224, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 7.1%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $57,740, a difference of 8.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $76,686, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 43.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 41.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 2.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 10.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 19.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.36%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 32.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 19.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.15 compared to 3.20, a difference of 1.5%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 6.6%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.40%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.2%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 28.1%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 10th grade (95.0% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.7%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 24.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 7.1%).