New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Tohono O'odham

Excellent
Tragic
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Tohono O'odham Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 39,346,656 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Tohono O'odham within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.013. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Tohono O'odham. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to a decrease of 13.1 Tohono O'odham.
New Zealander Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $30,256, a difference of 67.2%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $72,193, a difference of 59.6%), and median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $39,543, a difference of 54.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $45,248, a difference of 17.8%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 25.2%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $33,205, a difference of 27.8%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$30,256
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$72,193
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$61,663
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$36,349
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$39,543
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$33,205
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Tragic
$45,248
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$69,068
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$73,774
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$49,121
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.1%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 152.3%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 152.2%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 116.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 32.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 42.9%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 47.9%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
24.4%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
20.4%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
22.9%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
25.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
31.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
24.7%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
29.5%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
31.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
31.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
31.6%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
21.6%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
34.2%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Tragic
22.0%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
43.0%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
11.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
19.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
21.5%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (5.0% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 102.5%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 100.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 100.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 20.8%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
7.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
22.1%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
12.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
9.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
10.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
8.9%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 21.4%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 14.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 77.7%, a difference of 9.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 68.6%, a difference of 9.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 9.7%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
57.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
70.4%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
31.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Tragic
68.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
77.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
77.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
75.1%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.8%, a difference of 82.9%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 49.8%, a difference of 64.3%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 62.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and family households (62.9% compared to 67.1%, a difference of 6.8%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
67.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
37.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.53
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.8%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
9.1%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
36.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Good
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
49.8%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 53.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 50.0%, a difference of 13.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 8.0%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Tragic
84.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
50.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Poor
18.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Excellent
6.6%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 109.3%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 88.3%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 24.4%, a difference of 80.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.54%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
97.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
97.0%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
96.5%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
95.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
94.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
92.6%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
90.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
87.6%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
84.7%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
77.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
52.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
47.1%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
31.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
24.4%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
9.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
2.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.5%

New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Tohono O'odham communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 82.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 4.1%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 10.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.7%).
New Zealander vs Tohono O'odham Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderTohono O'odham
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
14.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
15.0%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Tragic
2.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
36.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
56.7%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.8%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
4.2%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
19.3%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
8.7%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
3.1%