New Zealander vs Ottawa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 26,736,538 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Ottawa within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.982. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.031% in Ottawa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 31.3 Ottawa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,101, a difference of 36.3%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $70,984, a difference of 34.0%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $86,380, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $47,366, a difference of 12.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $53,217, a difference of 26.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 32.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 30.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.0%, a difference of 1.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 37.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.41%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 43.0%, a difference of 13.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 62.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 76.8%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 27.3%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 36.5%, a difference of 20.2%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.21%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.11, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 38.0%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 73.6%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.2%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 54.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Ottawa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 33.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 47.6%, a difference of 3.0%), cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 11.9%).