New Zealander vs Mexican American Indian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,269,333 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Mexican American Indians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.409. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.386% in Mexican American Indians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 386.2 Mexican American Indians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,407, a difference of 35.2%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $47,990, a difference of 27.5%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $90,918, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,783, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.7%, a difference of 12.1%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,629, a difference of 19.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 44.2%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 38.7%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.74%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.4%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 20.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.3%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 36.0%, a difference of 5.6%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 34.6%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 35.7%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 45.9%, a difference of 2.8%), and currently married (47.4% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 29.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 23.3%, a difference of 14.2%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.0%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 58.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 12.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 90.7%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 82.3%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 81.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Mexican American Indian communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 14.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 2.7%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 3.9%).