New Zealander vs Immigrants from Uruguay Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 61,953,644 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uruguay within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.228. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.112% in Immigrants from Uruguay. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 112.4 Immigrants from Uruguay.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $56,975, a difference of 18.2%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $98,205, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $96,086, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $52,302, a difference of 1.9%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,945, a difference of 9.0%), and median earnings ($51,246 compared to $45,682, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 28.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 27.4%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 0.10%), single female poverty (21.0% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.6%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 34.4%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.9%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.4%, a difference of 0.97%), family households (62.9% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 19.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 19.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 88.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 10.3%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 48.7%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.73%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.74%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from Uruguay communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 15.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 13.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.4%, a difference of 0.58%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.87%).