New Zealander vs Czechoslovakian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,475,918 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Czechoslovakians within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.751. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.224% in Czechoslovakians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 223.8 Czechoslovakians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $43,806, a difference of 15.4%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $84,965, a difference of 12.0%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $103,273, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 1.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,224, a difference of 4.0%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $38,738, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 8.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.6% compared to 15.5%, a difference of 0.52%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 16.3%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 0.31%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.76%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 64.3%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.1%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 32.0%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.23%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.13, a difference of 0.83%), and family households (62.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 30.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 59.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 41.5%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 39.8%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 14.5%, a difference of 25.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (94.0% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.5%, a difference of 0.040%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Czechoslovakian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 26.1%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 11.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 0.61%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 46.6%, a difference of 0.86%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.1%).