New Zealander vs Immigrants from North America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,883,313 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from North America within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.743. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.686% in Immigrants from North America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 685.9 Immigrants from North America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($67,333 compared to $64,856, a difference of 3.8%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $91,860, a difference of 3.6%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $112,151, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $53,307, a difference of 0.020%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $60,265, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,286 compared to $109,198, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 11.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 6.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.13%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.7%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 0.88%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 3.6%), currently married (47.4% compared to 48.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and married-couple households (47.2% compared to 48.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.21%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.6%, a difference of 0.71%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.12, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 57.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 0.68%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 11.7%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.3%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Immigrants from North America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 9.0%), and male disability (11.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.51%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.58%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.0%).