New Zealander vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
New Zealander
Chickasaw
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
New Zealanders
Chickasaw
13.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
10.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
221st/ 347
METRIC RANK
16.3%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
318th/ 347
METRIC RANK
New Zealander vs Chickasaw Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,681,215 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of New Zealanders and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.280 and weighted average of 13.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,053,704 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.328 and weighted average of 16.3%, a difference of 24.0%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | New Zealander | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 8.6% | 4.0% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 67.9% |
| Range | 91.4% | 63.9% |
| Mean | 30.8% | 25.6% |
| Median | 16.9% | 23.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 16.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 39.9% | 31.0% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 26.6% | 14.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 28.6% | 12.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 27.9% | 12.6% |
Similar Demographics by Single Male Poverty
Demographics Similar to New Zealanders by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to New Zealanders are Central American (13.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Western Europe (13.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from the Azores (13.2%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (13.1%, a difference of 0.24%), and Somali (13.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Zimbabweans | 14.9 /100 | #214 | Poor 13.1% |
| Japanese | 14.8 /100 | #215 | Poor 13.1% |
| Austrians | 13.9 /100 | #216 | Poor 13.1% |
| Bermudans | 13.0 /100 | #217 | Poor 13.1% |
| Scandinavians | 12.9 /100 | #218 | Poor 13.1% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 12.6 /100 | #219 | Poor 13.1% |
| Central Americans | 10.9 /100 | #220 | Poor 13.2% |
| New Zealanders | 10.7 /100 | #221 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 10.0 /100 | #222 | Poor 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 9.3 /100 | #223 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Somalis | 9.1 /100 | #224 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 8.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Jamaicans | 7.7 /100 | #226 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Haitians | 7.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 13.2% |
| Lebanese | 6.6 /100 | #228 | Tragic 13.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Chippewa (16.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Marshallese (16.4%, a difference of 0.78%), Black/African American (16.2%, a difference of 0.80%), Osage (16.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and Dutch West Indian (16.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
| Seminole | 0.0 /100 | #311 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Comanche | 0.0 /100 | #312 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Cherokee | 0.0 /100 | #313 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #314 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #315 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Dutch West Indians | 0.0 /100 | #316 | Tragic 16.1% |
| Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #317 | Tragic 16.2% |
| Chickasaw | 0.0 /100 | #318 | Tragic 16.3% |
| Chippewa | 0.0 /100 | #319 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #320 | Tragic 16.4% |
| Osage | 0.0 /100 | #321 | Tragic 16.5% |
| Shoshone | 0.0 /100 | #322 | Tragic 16.7% |
| Creek | 0.0 /100 | #323 | Tragic 16.8% |
| Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #324 | Tragic 16.9% |
| Choctaw | 0.0 /100 | #325 | Tragic 17.0% |