New Zealander vs Blackfeet Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,700,350 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Blackfeet within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.797. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.341% in Blackfeet. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 1,341.5 Blackfeet.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,695, a difference of 34.2%), median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,717, a difference of 29.9%), and median household income ($95,146 compared to $73,509, a difference of 29.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $48,603, a difference of 9.7%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 9.9%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,864, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.3%, a difference of 44.0%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 39.2%), and married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 38.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 8.8%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 11.4%), and single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 33.2%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 3.9%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.5%, a difference of 0.36%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 33.2%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 29.2%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 24.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 63.6%, a difference of 1.1%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.24, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.4%, a difference of 0.54%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.6%, a difference of 0.58%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.4%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 66.5%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Blackfeet communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 28.2%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 25.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.8%, a difference of 5.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 13.9%).